一分快3app下载 - 在线登录平台网址入口下载 - 官网网站首页
一分快3规则2023-01-31 16:05

我是新时代的兵|驾驭黑色“巨鲸”的潜艇兵******

  解说:我是赵满星,中国人民解放军海军潜艇某支队二级军士长。2014年,我们372潜艇正在执行战备训练任务,深夜突遇“水下断崖”,潜艇在大洋深处急剧下沉。

  “水下断崖”,是因海水密度不同而形成。当潜艇从海水高密度海域进入海水低密度海域,潜艇的浮力会突然减少,专业上称这种现象为“掉深”。大多数常规潜艇的有效潜深为300米,如果不能迅速控制“掉深”,潜艇将急剧掉向海底,被海水巨大的压力解体,造成艇毁人亡。历史上,外国潜艇曾发生过因潜艇“掉深”造成的重大事故。

我是新时代的兵|驾驭黑色“巨鲸”的潜艇兵

  面对突发的严重“掉深”险情,372艇3名同志迅速封舱,全体官兵临危不惧坚守岗位,凭借过硬的军事素质和顽强的战斗作风与死神搏斗。180秒内,指挥员下达数十道口令,艇员们迅速完成500多个动作,关闭近百个阀门、开关。

  终于,潜艇成功自救上浮,化险为夷,创造了世界潜艇史上遭遇“水下断崖”成功自救的奇迹。

  解说:相对明星装备航母、四代战机,我们潜艇要维持低调。它无声、隐形,游曳在大洋深处,在人们的视线之外,借助水下的隐蔽性,预先潜伏在关键海域,战时从海中发动攻击。可以说,潜艇的存在足以遏制或影响战争进程。

  解说:我国的第一支潜艇部队,于1954年6月19日在青岛正式成立。主要用于水下突袭、反潜和实施侦察,是对海上和岸上目标实施打击威慑和钳制的重要力量。

  如今,人民海军已经拥有核动力和常规动力两大类潜艇。在潜艇上,“百人一杆枪”,各个岗位都与潜艇的生命力、战斗力相关。这就需要每一名潜艇官兵都拥有过硬的本领,成为技能“多面手”,不但要熟练操控设备,还要准确判断、排除故障。

  “不是所有人都有机会住在‘龙宫’里!”,“更不是任何人都可以当潜艇兵”,潜艇兵的工作是“神秘”的,更是神圣的,如果将潜艇部队比作是维护国家主权和海洋权益,维护国家战略通道和海外利益安全的水下盾牌,那么潜艇兵就是那个手握盾牌的人。我们深爱这份职业,因为“我们这支部队,是为打仗而生,因胜利而存在,几十年来从未改变。”每一名潜艇官兵都明白,胜利就是我们追求的最高荣誉!我骄傲,我们是人民的潜艇兵!我自豪,我们保卫着祖国的海疆万里。

  科学顾问:曹卫东

  制片顾问:范文军

  编 导:金 赫

  动 画:景晨龙

  鸣 谢:北京市人民政府征兵办公室

  出 品:中国科协科普部 光明网

一分快3app下载

中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

  中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。

  2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

  日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

  日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

  事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。

  因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。

  日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

  《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

  德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

  日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

  国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。

  太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。

  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

  By John Lee

  (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

  Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

  The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

  On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

  The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

  In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

  Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

  The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

  The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

  The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

  According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

  As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

  However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

  Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

  The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

  If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.

 

中国网客户端

国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布

一分快3地图